Search

  • Baseball Musings on Kindle


    Read my blog on Kindle

  • Priceless

    • We all know what a night out at the ballpark costs. While it may be "priceless", it's anything but that when the credit card bill arrives. A cash advance can help.
  • Partners


    Shop for batting helmet.





  • Patrons




  • Calendar

    February 2010
    M T W T F S S
    « Jan    
    1234567
    891011121314
    15161718192021
    22232425262728
  • Archives

  • Categories

  • Data



    eXTReMe Tracker








  • Rate this Blog at Blogged


  • March 27, 2009

    Camera Positions

    How do you build a ballpark today and not think about camera positions?

    Word is that the new Stadium is not particularly conducive to television cameras. The camera behind home plate, for instance, will have to shoot through the protective netting. Unlike the steeper old Stadium, there is no position to get a clean shot from that angle.

    YES folks also say the camera locations down the lines are not optimal. There is already talk that YES, ESPN and other broadcast entities will request changes.

    Having worked a bit in television, I have a certain fondness for the park formerly known as Jacobs Field. You drove the broadcast truck into an underground basement, plugged into a port, and your were on the air. Any stadium or arena built today should be broadcast ready from day one. After all, that’s where most of the money comes from.

    Posted by David Pinto at 12:08 pm | Broadcasts, Stadiums | Permalink | 1 Comment

    Comments


    1. Alex Poterack
      March 30th, 2009 @ 10:53 am

      Actually, I was under the impression that most clubs make more money from selling tickets than from broadcasts. Of course, if any club is an exception to that, it would be the Yankees.

      ReplyReply

    Leave a Reply

    Subscribe without commenting





    Bad Behavior has blocked 1929 access attempts in the last 7 days.