Baseball Musings
Baseball Musings
February 20, 2006
What's a Hit Streak?

According to this article, Jimmy Rollins is ready to pursue the hit streak record:

The Phillies finished one game behind NL wild-card winner Houston despite Rollins' outstanding effort in the final month. He hit .385 (62-for-161) during his season-ending 36-game hitting streak, and now has his sights on breaking Joe DiMaggio's major league record of 56.

There is a catch, though, because DiMaggio did it in the same season. The major league marks for longest hitting streak in one season and longest hitting streak spanning two seasons are separate records.

DiMaggio holds both marks with his 56-game streak in 1941, but there is a difference in the NL records: Pete Rose (1978) and Willie Keeler (1897) share the NL mark at 44 games. However, Keeler got a hit in his final game of 1896, so his run of 45 games overall is the first record Rollins can chase.

"I pretty much started getting ready for it mentally about three weeks ago," Rollins said.

I'm sorry, I just don't buy it. You can't take four months off and then pick up a streak. Streaks end with the season. How many exhibitions will Rollins play between now and then? Break the record within the season, or forget about it.


Posted by David Pinto at 07:17 PM | Records | TrackBack (0)
Comments

That's why when Orel Hershiser broke Don Drysdale's consecutive shutout inning record (58 2/3 innings), it seemed like a big deal that he break before the season ended. Hersisher would have just missed it had his last start not gone into extra innings and he pitched in the tenth to barely break the record.

http://www.retrosheet.org/boxesetc/B09280SDN1988.htm

Posted by: Charlie at February 20, 2006 08:51 PM

Streaks are kind of dumb stats/records anyways, because they're largely random and often not perfectly related to success. Ted Williams supposedly had a higher batting average during Dimaggio's streak than Dimaggio did (I can't confirm this, but it sounds reasonable)... Williams probably contributed more wins to his team over that stretch, and in a sense did his job better. But he lost the MVP, because Dimaggio was - essentially - consistently worse than Williams.

It's hard to know when to draw the line of what constitutes a streak and what doesn't. Sure, the end of a seson seems like a good point in which to cut it off. But what about a day or two between games? Or the All Star break? Essentially, Rollins is trying to accomplish the same feat as Dimaggio - get a hit in 56 consecutive major league ballgames. We know exactly what counts and what doesn't... and while the additive pressure of a 36 and a 15 game hitting streak is probably not anywhere near as much as one single 56 game streak, the accomplishment is otherwise just as difficult and luck-based.

Posted by: Mike at February 20, 2006 09:51 PM

On the flipside, Rollins could lose the streak the first day of this season because he lost the focus he had during the streak.

Posted by: Britt at February 21, 2006 12:46 AM

I think what Rollins is trying to accomplish is actually harder. Every day, DiMaggio probably tried to just to out and do the same thing, day after day, with momentum on his side.

Rollins on the other hand has to keep this going over seven months or so.

It's almost like comparing two different things.

Posted by: Tom G at February 21, 2006 06:49 AM

I find it comforting that JR is taking this seriously. As a player (even in junior leagues) you want to get a hit every day. If you don't, then maybe you shouldn't be a pro athlete. Yes, it has a lot to do with luck, but what I think is being overlooked here is the tremendous amount of focus needed to accomplish this feat. Baseball is such a mental sport and it's good to see a young player making the attempt/commitment to give his all every day. I'm pulling for him to open the season with a 7-10 gamer so he can get some good publicity for being a premier NL SS.

Posted by: Nate at February 21, 2006 10:55 AM

While there's a big part of me that agrees JR's run at the streak should be bounded within the confines of a single season, I also think it's a pretty impressive feat to get a hit in 36 consecutive at-bats let alone 56 no matter when those at-bats occur. I agree with the comment that what he's attempting might even be more difficult because he has no momentum or rhythm for the game after sitting out several months and whoever he faces on Opening Day is going to be gunning for him. Then again, the baseball sentimentalist in me wants to see him earn it one season. After alk, Joltin' Joe's record is for a single season...

Posted by: Jon at February 21, 2006 03:03 PM

Of course, by at-bats I really meant games.

Posted by: Jon at February 22, 2006 11:11 AM

If he manages to pull it off, we will have the Baseball equivalent of the "Tiger Slam". What should we call it, the Rollins Streak just doesn't sound right :)

Posted by: JP at February 22, 2006 01:37 PM
Post a comment









Remember personal info?