March 29, 2007
NL Central Preview, 2007
Earlier today I mentioned the Astros were my pick to win the NL Central. Since that elicited a number of responses, I thought it was time to start previewing the divisions in detail. So let's start with the NL Central.
The NL Central produced both an exciting regular season
finish and the World Champion Cardinals in 2006. The Cardinals defense of
their title starts with their superstar, Albert Pujols. The first baseman is
the best hitter of his generation, still young enough that he's just reaching
his peak. An injury kept him from challenging Bonds single season home run
record in 2006, so we'll see if he can get off to a similar hot start this
year.
The days of this being a dominating offense are over,
however. While Pujols is at his peak, partners in offense Scott Rolen and Jim
Edmonds are fading. Age and injury brought the pair back down to earth. It
used to be that the Cardinals could depend on these three generating a high number of
runs, so the Cardinals could afford to fill in around them with okay players.
That's not good enough anymore. The Cardinals need some skilled players around
Albert, and yet they continue to sign older veterans to shore up the team. The way they go about building the team around Pujols is actually similar to what the Giants do with Bonds. That leaves St. Louis' offense susceptible to injury.
Last year I thought the team would come back to the pack. They're going to need
a great season by Pujols to keep them one step ahead of the tightening NL Central.
Even the pitching staff is questionable right now.
Carpenter remains a true ace, but behind him are two young, unproven pitchers
in Wainwright and Reyes. Both have potential, but both need to prove they're
major league starters. The Cardinals, however, never fail to experiment. This
season, Bradon Looper becomes a starter after exclusively relieving during his long
major league career. I could find no record of a reliever making a successful
move to the starting rotation this late in his career. If his spring numbers
are any indication, Looper won't strike out many batters, leading to a ton of
hits. That's a very bad combination for any pitcher. This won't be an easy season for St. Louis fans. The team should compete, but the odds of
winning the division are not in their favor.
The team with the best chance of taking the division in my
opinion is the Houston Astros. They feature the best starting pitcher in the
division in Roy Oswalt, and the second best offensive player in Lance Berkman.
And like the Cardinals of prior years, the heart of the Houston order is
dominant. Berkman is healthy, surgeons fixed Morgan Ensberg's shoulder and
Carlos Lee consistently outputs 25 win shares a season. I suspect these three will do for the Astros what Pujols, Rolen and Edmonds used to produce for the Cardinals. Although Astros fans
may rightly be concerned about the long term aspects of Lee's contract, I
suspect he'll be very good this season.
There are problems with the offense, however, and a big one
is long-time Astro Craig Biggio. The future Hall of Famer continues to play as
he attempts to reach 3000 hits. But his offense is on the decline, and a team
that really wanted to win might replace him with a better player at second
base. But there's something to be said for loyalty, and the Houston fans get
to see Biggio go for his milestone hit and try one more time for a World
Championship. However, the rest of the offense is okay, and if you have three great hitters, a bunch of good ones should be enough to generate runs.
Backing up Oswalt in the rotation is Jason Jennings, who
pitched well in Colorado and should do fine in a better environment in Houston.
But the back of the rotation, especially the 4-5 starters are weak. I suspect
this will eventually drive Houston to re-sign Roger Clemens for another stretch
drive.
Still, the offense should overcome the pitching problems,
and while Houston isn't going to run away with the division, they have the best
combination of players in the NL Central.
The Cincinnati Reds held the NL Central in the palm of their
hands at various times in 2006. All they needed was a winning streak at the
top. Instead, taking first place usually led to a slump. A swoon by their
star hitter, Adam Dunn, and a poor trade for relief help doomed them to finish
back in a fairly easy division. At this point, the Reds can't do much about
the trade, but Adam Dunn took his slump seriously. The slugger spent the
winter training to be more like Ichiro. At first, that sounds like a bad
thing, but he's not working to go from a slugger to a singles hitter. Dunn,
strikeout artist extraordinaire wants to make more contact. That's a great
idea. With his strength and batting eye, more balls in play means more hits
(and homers) for Dunn, and more runs for the Reds.
Apart from Dunn, however, there's not much else offensively
to cheer about on the Reds in 2007. But they clearly own the best starting
rotation in the division. It's a bit of a topsey-turvey world in Cincinnati
this season, as the pitching is strong and the offense is weak. Aaron Harang
and Bronson Arroyo represent the best 1-2 punch in the division. And waiting
in the wings is top prospect Homer Bailey. If Milton or Lohse fail, look for
Bailey to move up to the majors and improve the staff.
With good pitching and a weak offense, expect a number of
close games and David Weathers to figure prominently in the Reds success.
The Milwaukee Brewers were the trendy pick to break the .500
barrier in 2006. They failed in that endeavor, but they're a young team still
on the rise. In a poll on the finish of the NL Central, almost every blogger
questioned put the Brewers first or second, making them the "wisdom of crowds"
favorite to win the division. My number don't show the Brewers that strong,
but the improvement arrows point up. Rickey Weeks and Prince Fielder are
young and play 2007 with a year of MLB experience under their belt. Moving
Hall to center puts a better arrangement of talent on the field. The addition
of Estrada at catcher is a good offensive upgrade at the position. The Brewers
should score more runs this season.
But the biggest boost should come from a healthy Ben Sheets
in the rotation. Sheets returning to his 2004 form gives the Brewers a solid
1-4 in the rotation. Of course, there's the possibility of too much optimism
here. Weeks and Fielder posted good but not great OBAs in 2006. Hall may not
adjust well in center. And Sheets, with his series of injuries may have seen
his best days. The Brewers are like the Tigers of 2006; if everything breaks
right, they can win the division, but I don't seem them as clear cut favorites.
The team that made the biggest off-season move was the
Chicago Cubs, signing Alfonso Soriano to an $18 million a year contract and
moving him to a tougher defensive position in centerfield. If Soriano can post
numbers anywhere near his 2006 level, it will be a huge boost to the Cubs win total.
Combine that with a healthy Derrek Lee and a locked up Aramis Ramirez, and
Chicago pitchers shouldn't lack for run support.
However, some things don't change. Cesar Izturis provides no
offense at shortstop, and his backup, Ronny Cedeno isn't any better. And what
happens if 2006 turns out to be a fluke for Soriano? They'll need Matt Murton
to continue to improve. Still my guess is that Lee and Soriano together for a
full year, with more improvement from a young Murton results in more offense in
Chicago.
Pitching presents a big question mark, however. Zambrano is
a terrific number one starter, but there's not much behind him. Lilly is more
of a third starter, but on this team he's number two. If you want to put a
positive spin on Jason Marquis' 2006 ERA, you can say he was left in to save
the bullpen in a few games while getting hammered. Of course, getting hammered
in a few games isn't exactly what one wants from a starting pitcher. Mark
Prior doesn't appear on his way to his old form, so this is a very iffy
rotation. The Cubs improved their offense without improving their pitching staff. I just don't see the Cubs winning with this team, unless the
division turns out to be as bad as 2006.
The Pirates bring up the rear in the division. Of course,
it's simple for Pirates fans in 2007. Root for Bay and Sanchez and hope
everyone else gets lucky. What's worse, however, is that the Pirates farm
system has nothing to show for years of major league ineptitude. The farm
system should be crawling with fine young talent, but the Pittsburgh AA and AAA
affiliates are crawling with players in their mid 20s. That's not the age that
produces stars. The Athletics and Twins showed how to build a team with a low
payroll. The Devil Rays and Royals can point to talent in their systems.
There's no excuse for the Pirates to be this bad. Things won't change until
Pittsburgh hires a GM who knows how to build a team from scratch.
So I see the division finishing Astros, Cardinals, Brewers,
Reds, Cubs and Pirates. But it's going to be really close, where any of the
first five teams offers legitimate reasons to finish first. I wouldn't assign a probability of winning the division higher that 20% to any team in the NL Central. That the first five teams, throw their names a hat, pull them out at random and you'll get just as good a prediction of the order of finish. I'm looking
forward to a tight pennant race in 2007.
Correction: I meant Ronny Cedeno, not Neifi Perez.
Good stuff here.
But Neifi Perez plays for Detroit now. Ronny Cedeno is the backup SS in Chicago now.
Agreed for the most part. But I don't think the Reds rotation is even close to Milwaukee's.
Odd...the cubs didn't improve their pitching? are you serious?
Lilly and Hill are both upgrades over the rookie crap they had last year (along with Maddux). Marquis is not worse than any of the rookies they had throwing last year, and he has pitched pretty well this spring. Miller should be a good #5, but looks to be pitching even better than that so far.
Don't get me wrong - they still don't have a great pitching staff. But they do have a staff that is much better than last year.
Combine that with the best offense in the Central, if not the National League, and you have a pretty good team.
"They feature the best starting pitcher in the division in Roy Oswalt"
No offense to Oswalt, because he is a very good pitcher, but I have to think Chris Carpenter is the best pitcher in the NL Central. As a Cubs fan, that's tough for me to say....
While the Reds might have the best 1-2 punch the Brewers have the most complete pitching staff in the division.
And for as much as you don't like the Cardinals offense but like Houston's, St. Louis scored 46 more runs last year with Pujols, Edmonds, Rolen and Eckstein spending time on the DL. Ensberg should be better and Lee is a plus but this lineup isn't going to rival the 2005 Cardinals lineup.
hi david!!!
you got more faith in my team than i do. and if you start pickin my stros to win how can i keep writing about how "the experts" are always wrong????
Cubs - 89-73
Brewers - 85-77
Cardinals - 80-82
Reds - 78-84
Astros - 75-87
Pirates - 70-92
the cubs pitching has gone down the drain....and the reds although there my favorite team ever i see them finishing last because of lack of good pitching, because Arroyo and Harang cant pitch every game