Baseball Musings
Baseball Musings
August 17, 2007
Dirty Deals?

Tracy Ringolsby points out that Bud Selig may void some draft deals:

Teams set the stage so that virtually no drafted player will sign a contract before the Aug. 15 signing deadline next year, figuring if they wait, the teams will blink.

Commissioner Bud Selig has some avenues to discipline teams. He has discretion on joint money received from marketing, radio and television. He also can take a hard line on the legality of contracts players signed and void any prearranged deals.

A prime example would be left-handed pitcher Casey Crosby of Maple Park, Ill., a fifth-round draft choice of Detroit. He was quoted in newspaper accounts at the time of the draft saying he had a deal for $750,000 but would have to wait until Aug. 15 because it was higher than the $150,000 slot money. He signed this week for $748,000.

Baseball continues its history of trying to contain costs by overtly screwing the players. Baseball should abolish the draft and the minor league reserve system. If the majors want to control the costs of players coming into the system, the best way to do that is to make the supply of players as large as possible. How do you do that?

  • No draft. Force US players to compete with Latin American players for jobs in the US. Right now, the draft makes the supply to each team tiny. With all amateurs free agents, if a prospect wants to go to college, it's, "See you later, call us if you change your mind," and on to someone else, even someone from outside the country who is will to work for a lot less.
  • All minor league players become free agents at the end of their contracts. This is basically what Charlie Finley wanted to do in the mid 1970s with major league players, but the owners wouldn't hear of it. Marvin Miller was very afraid of this idea, because the huge supply of players every year would keep free agent salaries low. So, with the majority of minor leaguers becoming free agents every year (I assume top prospects would get major league contracts, or at least long term minor league contracts), and amateur players competing with established minor leaguers, prices for new players will again be dampened.

The argument against this will be the rich teams will get richer. Fine. But when has any rule implemented to try to stop rich teams from acquiring the best talent ever worked? The draft had some short term success, but once those players picked up agents and learned the could get more money by threatening not to sign, they started falling in the draft and rich teams got them anyway. By constantly shuffling the minors by making the number of players available to teams large every year, my at least other teams have a shot at getting good talent into the system.


Posted by David Pinto at 08:11 AM | Draft | TrackBack (0)
Comments

Gee, when I was 18 years old, I wish somebody had "overtly screwed" me by handing me $748,000.

David, the extreme language doesn't help your case, not when everybody can see player salaries. As for abolishing the draft, I can't see how this would stop the rich teams from getting richer. It would just make it easier for them to scoop up all the best talent, as they now do with non-U.S. players. How many teams could even afford to get into the bidding on Dice-K?

Right now baseball has achieved notable parity, with good races in all six divisions and both wild cards. Would abolishing the draft and making the minor league systems of poorer teams competely vulnerable to cherry-picking by the richer teams really level the playing field any more? I doubt it very, very strongly.

Posted by: Casey Abell at August 17, 2007 08:44 AM

Well, if his deal is negated by Bud Selig, isn't that bad? Why does MLB care what teams pay players? And you can't tell me that a top pick sliding to 27th and getting drafted by the Tigers is doing anything to help competitive balance. Let the market work!

Posted by: David Pinto at August 17, 2007 08:53 AM

Given that Porcello signed a major league deal, I doubt Selig can unilaterally void it; that would end up in front of an arbiter right quick, and I'll bet he'd lose (as that has to be subject to collective bargaining, like any major-league contract).

As far as Crosby goes, my understanding of the process is something like this:
-----
Tigers: We have a deal?
Crosby: Sure.
Tigers: We have a deal for Crosby, but we're going over slot.
Selig: You can't do that. Try again.
Tigers: We've tried again. We're going over slot.
Selig: Don't do that. This is why it's bad.
Tigers: yeah ... uh-huh ... right. We're going over slot.
Selig: Grumble-grumble-grumble-grumble. Justify it in triplicate to each of these 18 people.
Tigers: Done.
Selig: And don't announce it until later.
Tigers: Right. Bye.
-----

Hence the "pre-arrangement" is exactly what you'd expect for any over-slot deal, and the MLB "approval" process is what is delaying the announcement.

As for abolishing the draft, I'd love to see that and maximum one-year contracts - total chaos, every year. Talk about your hot-stove league ... but the players would get totally screwed. Alex Rodriguez would still get his money, but the majority of players would get screwed. Owners would go nuts, but the smart ones would both save money and field a winning team.

Posted by: Subrata Sircar at August 17, 2007 06:39 PM

You can still screw me by giving me $748K.:)

They may well work some sort of luxury tax into the signing bonuses in the next CBA, because players don't want unproven kids to get cash either, they want the proven vets to get it.

Posted by: Al at August 17, 2007 08:15 PM
Post a comment









Remember personal info?