March 1, 2012

Hal Understands Value

Chad Jennings talked to Hal Steinbrenner about getting the Yankees payroll down to $189 million (emphasis added):

“I’m a finance geek,” Steinbrenner said. “I guess I always have been. That’s my background. Budgets matter, and balance sheets matter. I just feel that if you do well on the player development side, and you have a good farm system, you don’t need a $220-million payroll. You don’t. You can field every bit as good a team with young talent. When you consider Banuelos and Betances and some of the pitching we have coming up with Nova and Hughes and Pineda, next year, when one of those two or both of those guys are up, we’re going to have the kind of young pitching, I don’t know when the last time was.

“… Luxury tax is an option. It’s a personal option. We do it. We go into it knowing exactly what we’re doing. Being the only team that does it, I’m just not convinced we need to be as high as we’ve been in the past to field a championship caliber team.”

If you think about it, during the Yankees dominance of the late 1990s, they were a team with young, cost controlled players, and they didn’t need to spend a fortune to round out the team. They could afford quality, and a very deep bench and rotation.

It sounds like Hal wants the Yankees to be the Rays with money. They could depend on youngsters, but unlike the Rays, be able to plug holes with talented free agents. If Steinbrenner and Cashman pull this off, they’ll be an even more dangerous team.

Of course, it’s not that easy. The Red Sox basically tried this under Theo Epstein. They did win two World Championships, but they didn’t make the playoffs every year and won just one division title. There is a lot more uncertainty building on prospects than on tested major league players.

The Baseball Musings Pledge Drive continues through March. Please make a donation!

4 thoughts on “Hal Understands Value

  1. Pingback: Hal Steinbrenner confirms 2014 austerity plan | River Avenue Blues

  2. Ed

    All those division titles the Red Sox would have otherwise won with their approach were won by the Yankees.

    To some extent the extent you get from good front office management is limited because it can be duplicated. But the sort of issues the Yankees had in the 1980s, and the Mets had recently, have a big effect on the competitiveness of the other teams in the league because they are not deliberately copied, and sink only one or two teams.

    ReplyReply
  3. pft

    I expect the real reason is the revenue sharing rebates which could be worth up to 30 million for the yankees, and why not save on 15 million in tax to boot.

    “Of course, it’s not that easy. The Red Sox basically tried this under Theo Epstein. They did win two World Championships, but they didn’t make the playoffs every year and won just one division title”

    Don’t understand this at all. In the 8 years since 2004 the Red Sox went over the luxury tax threshold 6 times.

    The 2004 team had FA Manny Ramirez, David Ortiz, Johnny Damon, Kevin Millar, Bill Mueller, Mike Timlin and Keith Foulke and acquired Pedroia Martinez and Curt Schilling from teams who were dumping salary. The 2007 team was made up of FA Manny, Ortiz, Lugo, Daisuke (cost em 103 million so I call him a FA), JD Drew. They did have some home grown talent in Youk (pre Theo), Pedroia, Paps, Lester (pre Theo), and Ellsbury, but the Tampa Bay Rays they were not.

    ReplyReply
  4. Pingback: Hal Steinbrenner confirms 2014 austerity plan – - SportNewsX - Sport News AggregatorSportNewsX – Sport News Aggregator

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *