October 10, 2005

Top of the Ninth

It’s K-Rod versus Jeter to start the ninth inning.
Update: Jeter gets good wood on the ball and he lines a single into left.
Update: A-Rod grounds into a double play. He’ll never hear the end of that.
Update: Giambi hits a single between the shifted second baseman and rightfielder. Bellhorn pinch runs. It’s up to Sheffield now.
Update: Bellhorn takes second removing the force play.
Update: Sheffield chops one into short left field. It’s fielded by the third baseman, but he has no play. It’s now up to Matsui.
Update: Matsui falls behind 0-2.
Update: Womack runs for Sheffield.

46 thoughts on “Top of the Ninth

  1. ryan cortes

    good bight, thanks to all including david and yet it again….ballgame.. yankees lose.. tttttttttthhhhhhhheeeeee yankees LOSE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    ReplyReply
  2. JeremyM

    You know, as a Yankee fan I’m not any happier about this loss because the Red Sox lost. Guess that’s just me.

    ReplyReply
  3. JeremyM

    Fair enough Dan. It was tough watching you guys do it, but I was happy for the fans, if nothing else.
    It depends on what you consider wasting money. I would say it was, except Steinbrenner made a boat load of money as well. The defense was the goat, but that double play was terrible.

    ReplyReply
  4. David Dean

    In general, I’m pretty skeptical of the whole idea of clutch, but A-Rod is making me a believer!

    ReplyReply
  5. Benjamin Kabak

    Saying $208 million waste of money is showing your ignorance of the playoffs. Do you think Billy Beane is an idiot because the A’s lost in the DS a few years in a row? The best-of-5 format, after a 162-game stretch, is a crapshoot. You can take any 3 games and the Yankees will beat the Angels or the Angels will beat the Yankees. Conversely, you can take any 3 games and the Red Sox sweep the White Sox instead of what happened this year. It’s like saying someone sucks hitting with RISP when they’re 1 for 10 on the season.

    ReplyReply
  6. David Dean

    Benjamin – you’re 100% right. A couple balls go off the bat differently tonight, and the Yankees win this game.
    The question for Yankees, of course, is whether Steinbrenner will see it that way. While the Boss looks like he’s seriously mellowed in the past few years, he may very well see this as a $208 million embarassment.

    ReplyReply
  7. Dan

    I wouldn’t say your 100% right, maybe 55%. The best team wins these best of 5 a good majority of the time. I would say all 4 of the better teams won this year (the Yanks and Halos are about even though). The Yankees real problem is that they have a payroll nearly double everyone else’s, yet they still have glaring holes.

    ReplyReply
  8. Yankee Despiser

    Most of the time, the better team wins. The A’s didn’t win because Moneyball dictated that they don’t run, and station-to-station baseball doesn’t work in the postseason.

    ReplyReply
  9. Benjamin Kabak

    If station-to-station baseball doesn’t work in the postseason, how would you explain the 2002 Angels, the 2005 Angels, and, hell, even the 2001 Diamondbacks at times? That was all station-to-station baseball. When executed right, it does work.
    Who the hell knows how the A’s lost? They had the Yanks down 2 games to none and won because of luck. Remember that Jeter play? It was pure dumb luck. It’s like that guy catching the two home runs yesterday in Houston.

    ReplyReply
  10. Yankee Despiser

    The Junkees had the following problems: Lousy defense at 1b, lf, cf, rf, and c. They got nothing out of Pavano and Wright, and very little out of Mussina and Johnson. They outslugged everyone to get their 95 wins, but the Angels expoited them, and they’re the better team. That’s all there is to it.

    ReplyReply
  11. Dan

    Even as a bonafide Yankee hater I have more sense then to claim the Yankees won all those Championships through luck. Those Oakland teams were always similar to the Braves, top heavy with starters but a lousy pen and slump prone lineup.
    The Yankees stopped winning not because their luck ran out, more like their talent did. They certainly have more power now, but their defense and pitching has certainly regressed since the late 90s.

    ReplyReply
  12. Benjamin Kabak

    I would say they made it to the 2003 World Series through a fair amount of luck.
    But the 1998-2001 teams were really good. Good defense, great pitching, great hitting, great bullpen. Now it’s bad defense, great hitting, mediocre pitching, great Mariano Rivera.
    But for all of their money (and the Red Sox too), the team to beat next year is Cleveland.

    ReplyReply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *